disability is a fact to be determined by the board the weekly payment may be reviewed by the bonrd at the request of the employer the insurance company carrying the risk the commissioner of Insurance or the employe and may be increased or diminished or ended if the board finds such action to be warranted. Part . Coach Outlet Store Online If a judgment has been entered in accordance with the original award and the award is modified or the right to further payments denied by the board orderly procedure will in such cases require that the court be moved to modify the judgment or to vacate itIn Nike Air Max my opinion these and other difficulties which might be suggested most of which may perhaps be removed by legislation do not present insuperable objections to giving effect to the particular provision of the law although its application may Impose burdens upon the parties in Interest and upon the courts. It is not impossible to apply the law according to its terms.It ought to be said however that a series of Judgments upon an award is not contemplated by the act although a series of executions may be required to enforce payment of the Judgment. And the Judgment of the court should be entered In accordance with the award which means that it should recite and follow the award which furnishes the data for further action of the court This although objection to it Is not based upon that ground the judgment in Christian Louboutin Outlet the case before us did not do. The judgment entered in accordance with the Nike Australia award will remain in force until satisfied by payment according to its terms or by such action of the Industrial Accident Board brought to the attention of the court as renders its further enforcement improper. The award In this case Is ambiguous and it is apparent that the parties do not agree upon its force and effect. Claimant interprets it as an award ofa week payable during disability but not to be paid so long as the employer kept him In service at a weekly wage of . The employer plaintiff in certiorari Interprets it as an award in lieu of payment of which it was to employ claimant ata week as long as it had work for him to do. There being no more work for claimant it says the award is vacated has been performedby what It has done. The Nike Shoes Australia court below seems to have agreed with claimant and as the award may be interpreted as claimant says it should be and as no objection Is made to the form of the judgment no error of law requiring reversal of the judgment or requiring the court to set it aside appears and this court ought not to disturb it The award until modified by the Industrial Accident Board is in force.The defendant in certiorari will recover costs of this court.In an action for demurrage accruing upon plaintiffs own line and demurrage accruing to other lines of the system of which it was a part where the evidence to show that plaintiff Coach Outlet Store Online was a part of such system did not amount to an assignment of the other claims to it but showed that the other lines were operated by the plaintiff it could not recover demurrage charges due to the other lines merely by showing that they were operated by the same system.In an action for demurrage charges on a car of sugar in which the defendant gave notice of a setoff claiming that after delivery to the consignee by making delivery to Coach Outlet Store Online the plaintiff and after damage by a tornado the plaintiffs claim agent contracted with the defendant to rework and reship the sugar for a certain price the plaintiff could not contend that it was not liable because there was no consideration for the Nike Air Max 90 agreement on the ground that the damage was caused by an act of GodIn such action a letter from the defendant to the system by which plaintiff railroad was operated Christian Louboutin Outlet making a claim for delay in shipments